Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

We are sorry to see you leave - Beta is different and we value the time you took to try it out. Before you decide to go, please take a look at some value-adds for Beta and learn more about it. Thank you for reading Slashdot, and for making the site better!

The Birth of Semiconductor 2.0

ScuttleMonkey posted more than 7 years ago | from the printing-your-hardware dept.

Biotech 89

Roland Piquepaille writes "According to several articles in the press, an Austrian company has opened a new chip printing factory. But there is a twist. The chips produced by this factory, dubbed Semiconductor 2.0 by the company, will be organic semiconductors, and will be produced by inkjet printers. According to the company, the new factory will be able to produce 40,000 square meters of semiconductors per year, mainly for the biotech, clean tech, and defense industries."

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (4, Informative)

26199 (577806) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354803)

The feature size (10-100 micrometres) is 100-2000 times what you'll get from a modern silicon fab plant (50-100 nanometres). Call it 1000 times for the sake of argument. So for every organic transistor you could instead have 1,000,000 in silicon. It's not exactly going to be a revolution in processing power. (In fact it puts us back in the early 60s).

The market is apparently cheap, disposable logic. From the sound of it, the fab plants are about 100 times cheaper for the same chip-area/year output. That means each transistor will be up to 10,000 times more expensive; it's going to have to be very simple logic to be cost-effective.

The process sounds like it could be well suited to doing small runs, so I suppose that's something.

Ah well. I will go on record as saying that this is not hugely exciting. When in 50 years' time organic semiconductors have taken over you can all mock me as appropriate :)

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18354955)

This is an interesting implimentation. The idea that we all might be able to have an easy-bake fab at home in a few years, that's the revolution.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (5, Informative)

MITEgghead (570541) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355013)

There are actually cases when you want one cheap big transistor as opposed to a million tiny ones. For instance, if you have a display, also made of organics, with pixels around a millimeter then you can manufacture driving circuits on the same substrate even directly below the pixel. This keeps costs low and allows new flexible substrates to be used for mobile applications. Other applications from the article are biotech and military where the transistors would be used as part of real-time biological/chemical detectors which need relatively large areas to pick up enough of the substance to be detected.

The bottom line is that no one thinks these things are going to be doing heavy-duty logic. But they can certainly do easy logic cheaply and in novel applications.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (2, Interesting)

MobyDisk (75490) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355189)

When I was taking Computer Engineering at University of Maryland, 3 students were allowed to have their chip designs fabricated. We used a 250nm feature size, which was fine for what we were doing. Perhaps something like this could eventually be good enough that every student could have their chip fabricated. The larger feature size would be sufficient for a learning excercise. 10 micrometers does seem kinda big, but if the wafer is larger, it might still be good enough for academics.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (3, Funny)

QuantumG (50515) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355213)

If you RTA or if, say, the people who modded you up to +5 had RTA, you'd see why feature size is terribly unimportant.

Fuckin' Slashdot.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (1)

26199 (577806) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355321)

I did read the article. I was just pointing out that the headline+summary are pretty misleading; this is not even trying to be a silicon replacement.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (1)

QuantumG (50515) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355945)

Seems to me the headline and summary were provided by the company, via the article.. your interpretation may have been that they were trying to replace current microprocessors in all the various markets of which microprocessors are sold, but that certainly isn't what the summary or the article says. You're just arguing with yourself.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18355455)

Wow Quantum, who pissed in your wheaties? You are no normally not prone to outbursts over silly little posts.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18355711)

Any time somebody suggests that size matters, he gets a little cranky.

Semiconductor 2.0 is quite appropriate (2, Funny)

mangu (126918) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355429)

It's not exactly going to be a revolution in processing power. (In fact it puts us back in the early 60s).


Well, considering that silicon semiconductors must be somewhere around "Semiconductor 10.0" or so by now, calling something that reminds us of the early 60s "2.0" seems all right to me...

Re:Semiconductor 2.0 is quite appropriate (1)

ArsonSmith (13997) | more than 7 years ago | (#18359131)

Is that why linux is at 2.6 it reminds me of something from the 60s.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (1)

Brigadier (12956) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355453)



the idea of degradable logic is pretty enticing for the military. Say you have a spy drone which is down in enemy territory. it woul d be nice to be able to destroy it relatively easy. ie being able to protect technology.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (2, Funny)

Original Replica (908688) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356927)

the idea of degradable logic is pretty enticing for the military.

This isn't news, our military has been using degraded logic for years.

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (1)

ericrost (1049312) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355735)

Except you're assuming that the cost to PRODUCE the transistor is the same per fab. The operating costs of inkjet printers are far lower than the sputtering chambers, CMP equipment, lithography equipment, doping equipment, and any of the other high power, high cost materials that go into operating a traditional semiconductor fab. (I've worked in them for years)

Re:Hardly Semiconductor 2.0 (1)

hartz (731979) | more than 7 years ago | (#18361547)

So if you accidentally pipe a binary file to the semiconductor-squirting inkjet printer and lightning strikes at the right moment, does the printer produce a self-aware circuit? Need more input......

injet (3, Funny)

mastershake_phd (1050150) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354813)

Inkjet printers? Man they are going to be expensive.

Re:injet (1)

xaositects (786749) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354875)

yeah and imagine a leaky refill...

Re:injet (1)

ArcherB (796902) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354991)

Inkjet printers? Man they are going to be expensive.

Not if they go to InkSell.com [inksell.com] . Well, that or they could start their own squid farm.

(for those who don't get the squid bit, inksell has the most anoying commercials in the world. One has a girl that tells about her favorite pet saying that it is her squid "Inky. Dad says it's the only way we can afford ink refills". Another has a guy trying to save his office money by having a squid farm to produce ink. The nasal sounding secretary is whining because a report stinks. "Get it out of here before it stinks up the whole office!" On that note, never order from inksell. Their commercials are THAT annoyingly stupid! I'd rather hear the Head-On [wikipedia.org] commercials looped over and over!)

Re:injet (1)

runningduck (810975) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356001)

You will never be modded up with a delivery like that. You need an unexpected twist. For example:

Organic circuits will create a groundswell of competition. The manufacturing plants are so inexpensive that they will be sprouting up everywhere; especially since it will likely be cheaper to build them new than to re-fill the ink cartridges.

Re:injet (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18356345)

I see... So you're the guy who's also giving sexual advice to fellow slashdotters, right?

Re:injet (1)

luder (923306) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356267)

Yeah, by the time their ink runs out it will be cheaper to buy a new factory instead of more ink...

FUCK yo momma (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18354819)

fuck a little ten year old, first post, first post, fuck a little ten year old FUCK THAT ANCIENT GHOST

don't use caps, it's like YELLING niggers niggers jews kikes fuck the semites, it's awwwwright

p.s., the holocost never happened

Pigpile! (0, Troll)

Aphex Junkie (633436) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354823)

Another pigpile post... *sigh*

Re:Pigpile! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18355067)

I wish there was a mod for "-1 stupid fucker", but I won't waste my mod points on you anyway.

Especially as it seems someone else already is...

Of course, the REAL money . . . (3, Funny)

StefanJ (88986) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354855)

. . . will go to the folks who supply the ink cartridges.

Seriously, this is good news. Cheap, low performance electronics could play a big role in "leapfrogging" in the developing world. Going straight from low-tech to whoa!-tech, leaving out the capital and infrastructure intensive middle.

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (2, Insightful)

veganboyjosh (896761) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354907)

not only developing world. i was thinking more along the lines of cheap-o electronics inside cereal boxes, happy meals, etc...a lot of overlap, tho, i'm guessing there is.

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (3, Insightful)

Intron (870560) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355197)

And what would cheap electronics printed right onto packaging do?

*** ADVERTISING ***

This may be an advance, but I'm sensing a mixed blessing.

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (1)

vik (17857) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355929)

Don't print the circuitry on the packaging, print it on the 3D object you just printed out. http://reprap.org/ [reprap.org]

No reason to keep this circuitry planar either. Print any shape you like with the circuitry embedded in it.

Vik :v)

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (1)

tsalaroth (798327) | more than 7 years ago | (#18360461)

From the reprap.org site:

We hope to announce self-replication in 2008.

Does this bother anyone besides me?

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (1)

vik (17857) | more than 7 years ago | (#18422863)

Half the plastics manufacturing industry for a start...

Vik :v)

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (1)

maxume (22995) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355199)

*On* cereal boxes and happy meals. And everything else.

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (1)

Pollardito (781263) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356391)

imagine realtime, updating "have you seen this person?" pictures on milk cartons. when they find the kid they can beam the next kid's vitals onto everyone's breakfast table

"Minority Report" gimmick (1)

StefanJ (88986) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355763)

Oh yeah.

In The Minority Report, Tom Cruise's character has in his apartment an cereal box with talking, singing cartoon characters.

Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

EmbeddedJanitor (597831) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355005)

Why is it that westerners think that the developing world has to start way back in the 1960s and slowly work forwards towards the current time? That thinking is plain ignorance and does nobody any service. It is highly disrespectful of the industries that are blooming in developing countries. It also give the westerners a false sense of superiority/security: "Bah! Don't worry about them. Their technology is still stuck in 1963." One day you'll wake up and start whining because your job went to India/China/Rwanda.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (5, Insightful)

PopeRatzo (965947) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355497)

Why is it that westerners think that the developing world has to start way back in the 1960


Have you ever been to a "developing" nation? Many of them are "starting" way before "1963". The technological revolution in Europe and the West came after most of the residents of those regions were reasonably well-fed, healthy, had some plumbing, indoor refrigeration for food, etc. That is not the case in much of the "developing" world. I was in Tanzania a few years ago, and traveled through some of the countries along the Western coast of Southern Africa a few years before that. I've been to Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and have seen much of Central America. They wish they had 1963 technology in many of those places.

It's not about the level of technology, it's about how widespread it is among the population. Believe me when I tell you that just because the friends of the Prime Minister all have Mercedes, iPods, satellite phones and Playstations does not mean that their country has technology.

And just because the gluttonous creeps who run global corporations decide to set up factories or call centers or even code farms CERTAINLY doesn't mean that those countries have any technology. It just means that there's someone so despicable that they'd suck what little wealth is in those countries for themselves and their shareholders while taking advantage of the fact that the life expectancy is 49 so they won't have to worry about paying retirement benefits.

I wish I could write vividly enough to express how disgusting the exploitation of the "developing world" by global corporations is and how badly it's misusing the people in those places. And remember, once they can drive down the middle class here in the US so that Americans will accept those wages, they'll deign to come back here, but only after we promise never to utter the word "union" or "collective bargaining" again.

Strangely, what computers are in those countries mostly seem to be running Windows. Hmmm.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1, Troll)

mobby_6kl (668092) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356443)

I wish I could write vividly enough to express how disgusting the exploitation of the "developing world" by global corporations is and how badly it's misusing the people in those places.
You don't really need to, this topic has been done to death by hippies countless times over by now.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18357295)

May I add "mindless" and "hypocritical" to the word hippies?

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

louisadkins (963165) | more than 7 years ago | (#18359169)

Nope. Carry on.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

mobby_6kl (668092) | more than 7 years ago | (#18359513)

>May I add "mindless" and "hypocritical" to the word hippies?
You may of course, but you shouldn't, since that would be redundant.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | more than 7 years ago | (#18362767)

mobby, you are an ass.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

mobby_6kl (668092) | more than 7 years ago | (#18369131)

>mobby, you are an ass.

Hey, it was you who went on an offtopic rant after the second paragraph about global corporations which exploit the poor people in a disgusting manner by giving them callcenter jobs, all for the sake of showing how much you care and are trying to change the world through the power of music. I must, however, congratulate and compliment you on using the phrase "gluttonous creeps", that must be a new one.

To conclude, I'd add "humorless", "immature", and maybe "self-righteous" to AC's list.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

PopeRatzo (965947) | more than 7 years ago | (#18362827)

this topic has been done to death by hippies countless times over by now.

May I add "mindless" and "hypocritical" to the word hippies?


Wow, what a pair of horse's asses.

Re:Leapfrogging the developing world (1)

logicaleffort (884104) | more than 7 years ago | (#18371231)

It just means that there's someone so despicable that they'd suck what little wealth is in those countries for themselves and their shareholders while taking advantage of the fact that the life expectancy is 49 so they won't have to worry about paying retirement benefits.
agreed. see appropriately named [bbc.co.uk]

Re:Of course, the REAL money . . . (1)

zionian117 (1068050) | more than 7 years ago | (#18362739)

Sure dude... we were all looking for whoa! tech... time to upgrade!!!

The birth of 2.0 version 3 (5, Funny)

spun (1352) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354893)

2.0 is so 1.0 these days, isn't it time to move on to 3.0 yet?

Re:The birth of 2.0 version 3 (3, Funny)

Threni (635302) | more than 7 years ago | (#18354995)

3.0 is the new black.

Re:The birth of 2.0 version 3 (1)

BSAtHome (455370) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355021)

Not so fast, first you must charge for the upgrades to 2.1, 2.2 and bugfix 2.2a. Then you have a new revolution and the the whole thing is a thing of the past.

Re:The birth of 2.0 version 3 (1)

creimer (824291) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355243)

Everyone is still waiting for Great Buzzwords And Other Meaningless Words, Version 3.0 to come out.

The Dawn of Revision Metaphor Extreme Professional (1)

symbolset (646467) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355251)

Update Apogee Service Pack Rollup Carrier Grade Ultimate Edition Final Crest Terminal Climax Complete Mod Infinity.

version 2.

Roland Piquepaille again! (1, Interesting)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18354971)

Oh look! It is Roland Piquepaille providing another link to his ad filled blog. FUCK OFF Roland Piquepaille! We don't like you!

Oh wait. Never mind.

Re:Roland Piquepaille again! (3, Interesting)

$RANDOMLUSER (804576) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355313)

Oh wait. Never mind.
Exactly. I think he deserves a little credit for turning over a new leaf. He's not the click-whore of old, and like him or not, he always did have a talent for finding stories that appealed to the /. crowd. I used to hate him, but these days, I have more tolerance for him than I do for Zonk.

Re:Roland Piquepaille again! (-1, Troll)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18355433)

...he always did have a talent for finding stories that appealed to the /. crowd



All of which can be found days earlier by having RSS feeds to ArsTechnica, The New Scientist, Computer World, The National Academies, and the AP Science and Technology wires. What's his value add again?

Re:Roland Piquepaille again! (3, Insightful)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356609)

All of which can be found days earlier by having RSS feeds to ArsTechnica, The New Scientist, Computer World, The National Academies, and the AP Science and Technology wires. What's his value add again?

Um, you just proved your counterpoint - by us not having to read all the RSS feeds in existence. Cripes, I have 4762 unread items in NewsFire and I have none of those feeds you mentioned.

Re:Roland Piquepaille again! (1)

alfs boner (963844) | more than 7 years ago | (#18358043)

ArsTechnica, The New Scientist, Computer World, The National Academies, and the AP Science and Technology wires.

How do you find time to be a virgin when you're so busy checking all these websites?

Re:Roland Piquepaille again! (1)

drinkypoo (153816) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355493)

Ever since he stopped making posts that were basically a crap summary of a lousy blog post that contains a bunch of weblinks, he's been not entirely unuseful. Most of his content is even interesting. In fact, I wouldn't even have minded him sending people to his blog to try to make money if only there had been some value added. He is no longer doing that, so he need not add value - since he's not adding a pain in my ass by making me visit his stupid blog.

Re:Roland Piquepaille again! (1)

Reality Master 101 (179095) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355665)

Oh look! It is Roland Piquepaille providing another link to his ad filled blog. FUCK OFF Roland Piquepaille! We don't like you!

You actually look at who submitted the story? Why?

Imagine a beowolf cluster... (5, Funny)

vrmlguy (120854) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355085)

...that you can wear!!!

Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster... (1)

$RANDOMLUSER (804576) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355341)

Never mind wear, how about tatoos?

Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster... (1)

Original Replica (908688) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355503)

Now if these chips can be safely supported and powered by my organic self, that might be something truely interesting. A chip that can allow me to turn on the OLEDs in my hand, all powered by oxygen and gluecose would be quite interesting. The super downside? Powered organic RFIDs.

Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster... (1)

the_humeister (922869) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355643)

...or one that you can eat!

Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster... (1)

Pollardito (781263) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356417)

...or one that you can eat!
it's organic, perhaps it'll eat you. or is that the 3.0 version that they're only releasing in Soviet Russia?

Re:Imagine a beowolf cluster... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18358383)

...or fuck!

Organic hmm delicious (2, Funny)

aiwarrior (1030802) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355167)

Now with OLED's i can order electronic food, display the picture in my OLED display and eat it.
Simple.

Neat (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18355255)

Neater stuff at http://muvy.org/ [muvy.org]

Semiconductor 2.0 (2, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18355311)

FINALLY, I'll have something to run my web2.0 on.

Brings up a whole new meaning to... (1)

SmoothTom (455688) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355317)

...the term "printed circuit," doesn't it? :o)

--Tomas

Re:Brings up a whole new meaning to... (1)

adtifyj (868717) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356317)

Not really; it just brings back memories of a time when circuit boards were "printed" using photoengraving.

Creating its own market (1)

carpeweb (949895) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355487)

FTA: "the company has also formed alliances with water testing companies and other industrial concerns"

"The meter is showing that there's ink in the water, sir."

"Good thing we had Nanoident semiconductors; better order some more."

The equivalent of one silicon wafer a year? Wow! (3, Insightful)

nick_davison (217681) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355655)

According to the company, the new factory will be able to produce 40,000 square meters of semiconductors per year.
Given that the whole goal of semiconductors has been to make them smaller and smaller, boasting about how much area you can use up isn't necessarily a good thing.

It's worse when you consider this tech is roughly micrometers to silicon's nanometers. 10^3x10^3 means you're looking at a millionth the area utilization of silicon. Divide 40,000 by a million and you're looking at the equivalent of 0.04 square meters of silicon or roughly that of a single 12" wafer. A whole factory to produce the equivalent of one silicon wafer a year? Not such a great boast.

Yeah, I'm sure I've got meters squared and square meters confused, messed up an area calculation or somesuch... But you get the idea.

Re:The equivalent of one silicon wafer a year? Wow (1)

bill_mcgonigle (4333) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356599)

Given that the whole goal of semiconductors has been to make them smaller and smaller, boasting about how much area you can use up isn't necessarily a good thing.

What if you want things big, like Big Screen TV's? Of if it doesn't matter how dense things are (at semiconductor sizes), like DNA chips, but cost per unit is the most important factor?

This obviously isn't good for making CPU's, but where size isn't important or large is the goal - those would appear to be the addressed niches.

Maybe, if they're really successful ... (1)

SimonInOz (579741) | more than 7 years ago | (#18357607)

Maybe, if they're really successful at miniaturisation, they can move into a smaller factory.

Wow Slashdot really suprised me (1)

CrazyJim1 (809850) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355709)

No one posted a virus joke about the organic components. I mean its one thing to see something as totally cliche, but for a mass amount of people to think something is so cliche that everyone avoids it, now that's something.

If they're from an ink jet . . . (1)

slurry47 (27097) | more than 7 years ago | (#18355797)

Why can't I get these orgasmic semiconductors printed directly on me? Or on the GF and save me some time?

What's with the marketroids... (1)

Joelfabulous (1045392) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356751)

Seriously, it seems like everything is being turned into version numbers. Does it ever occur to them that, you know, buzzwords actually *kill meaning?*

Maybe a little overhyped... (1)

Assassin bug (835070) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356043)

But consider a company the bit in the article regarding one-time use applications could be a gold mine. Think food safety and "biosecurity" -- I'm seeing biochem companies jumping all over this.

Funny that square. . . (2, Insightful)

treeves (963993) | more than 7 years ago | (#18356205)

meters are used as the measure of production, rather than #transistors or some other more meaningful measure. Hiding the fact that 1 sq cm only has 1000 transistors instead of 1,000,000?

"Would you like to print your new graphics card?" (2, Funny)

7Prime (871679) | more than 7 years ago | (#18357085)

I can just imagine 20 years from now:

"Congradulations! You have just downloaded a new video card. Print video card? [Yes] [Cancel]"

Re:"Would you like to print your new graphics card (1)

BronsCon (927697) | more than 7 years ago | (#18358381)

Hey! I just pirated a $500 video card! I'm downloading a torrent of that new 8 core 128=bit CPU, too! I think I'll grab some pr0n next...

Re:"Would you like to print your new graphics card (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18359501)

You may be joking, but read this:

http://www.charcoaldesign.co.uk/weblog/11 [charcoaldesign.co.uk]

exciting stuff!

mod do3n (-1, Redundant)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18357539)

If *BSD is to noises out of th3 of business/ and was

yes, organic semiconductor era is coming (1)

rapidus (1075921) | more than 7 years ago | (#18357563)

Organic semiconductor technology is for the low end application. The fast is for large-scale application such as solar cell. Nowadays crystalline silicon semiconductor tech cannot meet the demand, and amorphous silicon tech is so expensive, but organic solar cell efficient is low (5~6%). The second is for easy disposed application such as smart labels especially for 13.56MHz RFID tig. IMEC demonstrated organic diode that approached 50MHz at the year 2005, and Philip showed the fast 13.56MHz organic RFID tig chip at ISSCC2006. (But these processes are lithograph not printer) Organic semiconductor cannot replace the traditional crystalline silicon market, because of low charger mobility (nowadays record is going 3 cm2/Vs), but is one strong competition for amorphous silicon and polycrystalline silicon. Manufactures aim to organic semiconductor market had emerged, such as OrganicID, PolyIC, Plastic Logic, Polymer Vision, which aim to smart labels and plane display. At the end of year 2006, one IP based OTFT-LCD technology came out of the laboratory in north-east of China. Tomorrow's LCD displays will be more cheaper.

Depreciation (1)

SmlFreshwaterBuffalo (608664) | more than 7 years ago | (#18357605)

Most companies have to worry about depreciation when they can't keep their fabs running at capacity.

So does this one need to worry about the ink cartridges drying out? Moreover, how soon before their cartridges start shutting themselves off claiming they've "expired"?

I hope! (1)

TheSpatulaOfLove (966301) | more than 7 years ago | (#18358365)

Man, I hope that Staples will still give me $3 off when I bring in my empty ink cartridge - I'm not looking forward to paying a few thousand to refill my Semiconductor printer!

Free Range Computers? (1)

KenStech (1015127) | more than 7 years ago | (#18358545)

"In other news, Dell 2.0 announced the launch of their 100% certified organic, Free Range Computers. Offering users a healthier alternative to the highly processed artificial computers of the past."

Mmmm, organic... Free-range? (1)

mi (197448) | more than 7 years ago | (#18358843)

Produced without artificial pesticides and antibiotics. Raised on open ranges with loving care and professionally slaughtered by vegetarians. No genetic modifications.

We care.

Ta gueule, Pissepaille ! (0, Offtopic)

stud9920 (236753) | more than 7 years ago | (#18359037)

n/t

Since it's organic... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 7 years ago | (#18360031)

doesn't that mean it'll excrete waste?

So instead of buying a compressed air can to clean out your computer, you'll need to buy a pooper-scooper too XD

Degradable Chips? (1)

shaitand (626655) | more than 7 years ago | (#18362359)

The size limits the number of useful applications for now but that will improve. What concerns me is that this will be used to produce consumer products with a limited shelf life.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?