Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

How Facebook Will Power Graph Search

Unknown Lamer posted about a year and a half ago | from the moar-power-?x-unification-error dept.

Facebook 26

Nerval's Lobster writes "Last week, Facebook announced Graph Search, a system for searching the social network's vast collection of users, photos, and 'Liked' interests. But how will Facebook power it? The Disaggregated Rack, which will separate compute, RAM, storage, and caching functions in order to remain flexible in the face of Graph Search's changing needs. By breaking up resources and scaling them independently of each other, Facebook can scale without needing to constantly open up new servers and upgrade new hardware."

cancel ×

26 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Dupe? (0)

photonic (584757) | about a year and a half ago | (#42654913)

Maybe they could put the processor on a separate daughterboard and call it Group-Hug [slashdot.org] , as in yesterday's story.

Re:Dupe? (-1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655285)

FecesBook is dA Gehy. Jo Homoz! giT iT!

How will they power it? (5, Funny)

Lost Race (681080) | about a year and a half ago | (#42654979)

Probably with electricity from the grid, generated from coal, gas, hydroelectric, nuclear, wind, solar, geothermal, etc, as usual. TFA didn't actually mention power sources at all.

Re:How will they power it? (1)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655011)

Wasn't it "trapped dark souls of ex-employees, spinning the generator wheels in eternal damnation"?

Re:How will they power it? (1)

William Miller (2821191) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655023)

This is a very smart reply, isn't it?? As for me, any site search engine updates are very interesting from the coding and SEO points of view. It must have taken 2-3 months for their specialists to work hard with it and make lots of test before launching. I'm not a great Facebook user, but as a webmaster I would look for some more information on their searching algorithm.

Re:How will they power it? (1)

HaZardman27 (1521119) | about a year and a half ago | (#42656801)

This is a very smart reply, isn't it??

You must be new here.

Re:How will they power it? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year ago | (#42661201)

This is a very smart reply, isn't it??

You must be new here.

Judging by his user ID, yes.

Facebook search already better than Googles. (0)

thammoud (193905) | about a year and a half ago | (#42654987)

Just learned that something called RAM sled actually exits. Not on Google search yet.

Re:Facebook search already better than Googles. (2)

MurukeshM (1901690) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655123)

2 million+ results on Google. What the hell are you smoking?

Re:Facebook search already better than Googles. (1)

dintech (998802) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655471)

Wood chippings left over after making some of these...

http://www.theramsled.com/ [theramsled.com]

I don't want graph search. (4, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42654991)

I don't want "Graph Seach". I just want to search my damn feed. Is that too much to ask?

Re:I don't want graph search. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655183)

"my damn feed", i'm sorry but it doesn't belong to you.

Re:I don't want graph search. (3, Interesting)

History's Coming To (1059484) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655747)

That's why the best way to search your own feed is via FQL, just set up an app as if you were a third party marketing company and it's all suddenly much easier to get to your own data.

Re:I don't want graph search. (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42656857)

The Facebook Experience.

Re:I don't want graph search. (1)

DarkOx (621550) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655847)

Don't know what browser you are using but have you tried pressing F3?

the marketers vs. users war (5, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655051)

the funny part is that on one hand you have users trying to protect their privacy while marketers are trying to actively exploit it. from what i have read on forbes (links here [forbes.com] and here [forbes.com] ) graph search is more for marketers rather than users. after all, which users care about searching for anything besides people on facebook?

and all of this is happening on the same website! so essentially facebook is now creating products/features which are basically opposing eachother.

it must be tough to work in privacy department at facebook. privacy at facebook is being slowly shoved aside in favor of the marketers. and we all know how this story plays out.

Re:the marketers vs. users war (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655293)

graph search is more for marketers rather than users.

Graph search is ENTIRELY for marketers ... And that's why Facebook had to override the user setting where users had explicitly instructed Facebook that their name and other data shall not be included in any search service.

Graph search is "powered by" disregarding the data handling directives that accompanied the data when it was stored on Facebook's servers.

Re:the marketers vs. users war (1)

tlhIngan (30335) | about a year and a half ago | (#42657629)

the funny part is that on one hand you have users trying to protect their privacy while marketers are trying to actively exploit it. from what i have read on forbes (links here and here) graph search is more for marketers rather than users. after all, which users care about searching for anything besides people on facebook?

and all of this is happening on the same website! so essentially facebook is now creating products/features which are basically opposing eachother.

it must be tough to work in privacy department at facebook. privacy at facebook is being slowly shoved aside in favor of the marketers. and we all know how this story plays out.

It's actually quite easy, one you realize that online privacy is a myth perpetrated by those who want to sell your information.

There is no "online privacy", and even the simple act of "friends only" can still mean "everyone" (as Mark Zuckerberg's sister found out - there was nothing wrong with her settings. Just one of her "friends" decided to re-tweet the photo to the world).

Online "privacy" is an illusion created to get people to share stuff they wouldn't otherwise, thinking they have control over it. Well, think of it this way - everything you put on facebook, google+, twitter, etc? Try doing the same thing - except as an email to your friends. It's the same effect, your email with your information is "friends only", but nothing stops them from forwarding it to the entire world or posting it on their blog or whatever.

The smart ones online realize this, realize that "don't post online what you don't want the world to know" still applies, and carefully crafts an online persona that reflects their desired image. No drunken photos (or going out with friends with a propensity to do so), photos in neutral settings or "doing community work" or other stuff, etc.

How will they power it? (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655143)

Through Hadoop...

Graph Search Useful or not (-1, Flamebait)

myelizacitra (2818427) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655231)

Is Graph Search useful for users or danger for user privacy.But one thing is sure it is good for promoting your brand..... http://tiny.cc/615arw [tiny.cc]

"graph search" (3, Insightful)

Swampash (1131503) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655753)

To misquote Steve Jobs: if you see the word "graph" in a customer-facing product, they blew it.

The only people who use or have even heard the term "social graph" are product managers at Facebook and Google. Searching a "graph" means absofuckinglutely nothing to an end user.

Re:"graph search" (2)

oztiks (921504) | about a year and a half ago | (#42655937)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2013/01/21/facebook-graph-search-runs-on-likes-that-advertisers-have-already-paid-for/ [forbes.com]

Never thought I'd look to Forbes for insight but the author has somewhat of a point. Graph Search is not a new feature rather it's a "mop and bucket" revision of an old and broken feature, the "like".

And anyone who reads XKCD (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42656211)

To misquote Steve Jobs: if you see the word "graph" in a customer-facing product, they blew it.

The only people who use or have even heard the term "social graph" are product managers at Facebook and Google. Searching a "graph" means absofuckinglutely nothing to an end user.

It's not the first use of the mathematical term "graph" in a social context.

http://xkcd.com/403/ [xkcd.com]

welcome to the future (0)

Anonymous Coward | about a year and a half ago | (#42655929)

So they basically are NOW realizing that you can run multiple processes on a single processor? They are so innovative. Scape away all of they BS techno jargon and you are left with, "Facebook will power a database search by using unused CPU cycles on existing hardware."

Any non-story being used to influence the stock price of company that doesn't produce anything, only consumes(you).

Human rights (1)

halfkoreanamerican (2566687) | about a year and a half ago | (#42656027)

It is likely going to be powered by the blood of unknowingly consenting minors and 50 somethings.
Check for New Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>